Why You Might Not Want To Be A Chai Wallah

by Charlie on October 13, 2009

in Creativity, Entrepreneurship

This video post is a reaction to Seth’s “Chai Wallah,” which has been on my mind for a few weeks. The video is almost six minutes long, and if you’re reading this in a feed reader, you might have to click through to view it.

Thanks for watching!

SHARE & ENJOY:

StumbleUpon Stumble this post
submit to reddit Submit to Reddit
Delicious Bookmark on Delicious
RSS Subscribe to Productive Flourishing

{ 1 trackback }

Tweets that mention Why You Might Not Want To Be A Chai Wallah -- Topsy.com
Twitter: lovejodirenee
October 13, 2009 at 6:14 pm

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

1 x (republic) October 13, 2009 at 6:54 pm

Hey man, really diggin’ the video posts! Keep up the awesome work. – Peace
.-= x (republic)´s last blog ..Jonathan Mead’s “The Zero Hour Workweek” =-.

Reply

2 Kelly Parkinson October 13, 2009 at 8:38 pm

I agree 100%! Our businesses should be big enough to allow us to reflect all the best parts of ourselves. Why should I have to hide so I can fit into some profit-making specialty? Isn’t that like having a job? Isn’t the point of not having a job to be able to have more fun, without all the rules? I love the idea that my business is as flexible and expansive as I am. Let the big companies sell chai. We’ll all be up to something interesting.

Reply

3 Charlotte October 13, 2009 at 8:51 pm

Great post, Charlie.

I remember the chai wallah post. It bothered me in a similar way, but I couldn’t quite express it in the way you have. Being a “chai wallah” in several different areas, however, is more do-able. I keep coming across the idea that people should do 3 things, and switch around between them. That is, enough things for variety, and not so many things to where you cease being able to put out excellent stuff. I’ll go with that. :)

A great antidote to Seth’s post is Chris Guillebeau’s very recent post, here:

http://chrisguillebeau.com/3×5/why-not-try-it-all/
.-= Charlotte´s last blog ..Voice. =-.

Reply

4 Janet Bailey October 13, 2009 at 10:12 pm

Another danger of overspecialization: tunnel vision and potentially slow reaction time. (The old “When you’re a hammer, every problem looks like a nail” issue.) We have to be nimble nowadays, right? Love your point about the value of synthesizing and how this may require broad focus. And I agree with @Kelly, it’s way more fun to have a menu of things to choose from!

Reply

5 Karl Staib - Work Happy Now October 14, 2009 at 11:51 am

If I had to do just one thing well I would get bored. My success in helping people is attributed to my well rounded nature. I feel that if I limited myself to one aspect of work happiness then I wouldn’t be as helpful. I’m not patting myself on the back. I do make a lot of mistakes. But it’s these mistakes that I improve on and make a more well rounded me.

It’s about using my strengths to communicate in various mediums. If I focused on just one medium I don’t think that I would be as good. Man this sounds conceded, but I have to get my point out.

We all have strengths that transfer over into different categories. We need to explore each category to give the most help to the people we work with.
.-= Karl Staib – Work Happy Now´s last blog ..Who Do You Admire at Work? =-.

Reply

6 Ralph October 17, 2009 at 5:28 pm

Great post! Very useful stuff! Keep up the good work!

Reply

7 Charles Broadway October 18, 2009 at 4:56 am

I find myself in agreement with you. Specialization will increase your income and performance in a certain area because you are the best in that area, but it also increases your risk. It amounts to putting all your eggs in a single basket. Considering how rapidly our economy changes, this is a bad strategy.

I see the Renaissance Ideal making a comeback, and people referring to their primary occupations as merely their “day job.” They mix it up, and they also grow accustomed to ceaseless learning. They are dynamic where specialists are static.

Reply

8 Hunter Nuttall October 19, 2009 at 8:54 pm

The supposed need to be a specialist is something that has always bothered me. Everyone says it’s so important, but I’m just not that guy, and I can’t limit myself to one thing.

Of course, being completely confused and chaotic isn’t a good thing. I’d prefer a surgeon who specializes in one type of surgery over one who also sells homemade dog toys and finds you good deals on car insurance.

But there are many fields that complement one another well, where someone who can draw from all of them has something special to bring to the table.

In an evolutionary sense, organisms that specialize are at an advantage, as long as their environment never changes. When it does, they get wiped out. And our environment is always changing.

For my link, I’m pointing to my relevant “Specialization is for Insects” post (hope it’s OK to mention that).
.-= Hunter Nuttall´s last blog ..Finding Your Primary Color, And Making The Leap =-.

Reply

9 Lisa Wood October 23, 2009 at 1:14 pm

I can’t limit myself to just one thing either. Thanks for a very insightful video, Charlie. You always get me thinking. :)
.-= Lisa Wood´s last blog ..Why is Accountability Important? =-.

Reply

10 Scott Webb October 26, 2009 at 1:46 pm

This is the direction my blog is moving.

I actually relate it to renaissance living. Great to hear and I think it’s a HUGE reason why people get so stuck.

Even Gary Vaynerchuk talking about having that one passion and going out and crush it. I believe we can have a great number of passions and be awesome at them all. While specialization is great for some people, it’s not for someone like me.
.-= Scott Webb´s last blog ..Hot Wordpress Themes Released Recently For Photography =-.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: