<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The S.T.A.R. Method: A More Effective, Less Stressful Way to Process Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>The Art of Meaningful Productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:47:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karilee</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4738</link>
		<dc:creator>Karilee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4738</guid>
		<description>Glad to see the Inbox Zero piece, and I know &quot;the Loop&quot; far too well! 

I definitely recommend that everyone have/create/learn a system. It made a big difference for me when I was taught one. More time + less stress = win!

Yours is very reasonably priced and I think anyone who doesn&#039;t have a system that works for them would benefit. I can tell from your posts and your thoughtful reply that you &quot;get&quot; it, and I like that you have enough flexibility in your approach to accommodate different personalities.
.-= Karilee´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CorestoneManagementConsulting/~3/RQ3Ya3XYHWQ/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Are You Meant to Be a Manager?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see the Inbox Zero piece, and I know &#8220;the Loop&#8221; far too well! </p>
<p>I definitely recommend that everyone have/create/learn a system. It made a big difference for me when I was taught one. More time + less stress = win!</p>
<p>Yours is very reasonably priced and I think anyone who doesn&#8217;t have a system that works for them would benefit. I can tell from your posts and your thoughtful reply that you &#8220;get&#8221; it, and I like that you have enough flexibility in your approach to accommodate different personalities.<br />
.-= Karilee´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CorestoneManagementConsulting/~3/RQ3Ya3XYHWQ/" rel="nofollow">Are You Meant to Be a Manager?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4707</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4707</guid>
		<description>@Karilee: I&#039;m with you about clearing Inbox - I think it&#039;s at best a secondary goal, which I hopefully made clear in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.productiveflourishing.com/inbox-zero-is-overrated/&quot; title=&quot;Inbox Zero is Overrated&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Inbox Zero is Overrated&lt;/a&gt;. And one of the main advantages of the STAR method is that you &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; read every message; instead, you scan for subjects and senders.

The system as mentioned in this post doesn&#039;t mention delegation, but the more comprehensive product does in the sense that it would become a &quot;Respond&quot; message. In that sense, you can understand &quot;respond&quot; as a conversational prompt or a behavioral prompt, but delegation would be a part of the latter way of understanding respond.

I&#039;m glad you have a system that works for you, though - that&#039;s the important bit. So many of us &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt;, and that&#039;s what &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.productiveflourishing.com/email-triage/&quot; title=&quot;Email Triage: An Easier, Effective, and Less Stressful Way to Process Email&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Email Triage&lt;/a&gt; tries to amend.

Thanks so much for the feedback and discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karilee: I&#8217;m with you about clearing Inbox &#8211; I think it&#8217;s at best a secondary goal, which I hopefully made clear in <a href="http://www.productiveflourishing.com/inbox-zero-is-overrated/" title="Inbox Zero is Overrated" rel="nofollow">Inbox Zero is Overrated</a>. And one of the main advantages of the STAR method is that you <em>don&#8217;t</em> read every message; instead, you scan for subjects and senders.</p>
<p>The system as mentioned in this post doesn&#8217;t mention delegation, but the more comprehensive product does in the sense that it would become a &#8220;Respond&#8221; message. In that sense, you can understand &#8220;respond&#8221; as a conversational prompt or a behavioral prompt, but delegation would be a part of the latter way of understanding respond.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you have a system that works for you, though &#8211; that&#8217;s the important bit. So many of us <em>don&#8217;t</em>, and that&#8217;s what <a href="http://www.productiveflourishing.com/email-triage/" title="Email Triage: An Easier, Effective, and Less Stressful Way to Process Email" rel="nofollow">Email Triage</a> tries to amend.</p>
<p>Thanks so much for the feedback and discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karilee</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4706</link>
		<dc:creator>Karilee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4706</guid>
		<description>Charlie, I liked your point about how email Inboxes are different from paper Inboxes, allowing us to &quot;batch process&quot; what&#039;s in there. I think that&#039;s a really important change for people to discern. Getting away from the paradigm that expects anyone to Read everything in their Inbox is very important.

I&#039;m still, however, torn on whether email Inboxes should be cleared AT ALL any more, and I&#039;m quite sure all email shouldn&#039;t be read, or even opened. I find myself more efficient just not worrying about it. I delete really obvious junk, but even much of the marketing email stays. I don&#039;t necessarily read it or feel any obligation to, but months from now if I need reference material on a topic, I can do an email search and sometimes find a useful article or contact. Whether you prefer to leave this stuff in your Inbox, or mass-drag thousands of emails to a Reference folder, overcoming the need to &quot;clear the Inbox&quot; can be the biggest time-saver of all. Ask yourself whether it&#039;s really worth even scanning many emails, or deleting them, with today&#039;s excellent search technology.

A final but important point - your system doesn&#039;t mention delegation. I work as an Online Business Manager for companies that literally hand me chunks of their business to manage for them. Entrepreneurs who aren&#039;t good at communications, working with staff, or creating systems, simply have me do that. I work with some brilliant Virtual Assistants who can allow an entrepreneur to pass over their customer service, or affiliate management, or other aspects of their business they don&#039;t want to do themselves. I think it&#039;s really important for each of us to ask where our brilliance lies, and do our work there, delegating as much of the rest as possible.

That means I use the TRAF, or (more fun but less elegant) FART system for email and such. Toss, Refer, Act, File. This allows me to get that very important delegation step in the process. Notice there&#039;s no &quot;Read&quot; step at all - it&#039;s always part of Act or Refer, but not done for all steps.
.-= Karilee´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CorestoneManagementConsulting/~3/YIfr0ttaHwg/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reducing Office Politics&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, I liked your point about how email Inboxes are different from paper Inboxes, allowing us to &#8220;batch process&#8221; what&#8217;s in there. I think that&#8217;s a really important change for people to discern. Getting away from the paradigm that expects anyone to Read everything in their Inbox is very important.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still, however, torn on whether email Inboxes should be cleared AT ALL any more, and I&#8217;m quite sure all email shouldn&#8217;t be read, or even opened. I find myself more efficient just not worrying about it. I delete really obvious junk, but even much of the marketing email stays. I don&#8217;t necessarily read it or feel any obligation to, but months from now if I need reference material on a topic, I can do an email search and sometimes find a useful article or contact. Whether you prefer to leave this stuff in your Inbox, or mass-drag thousands of emails to a Reference folder, overcoming the need to &#8220;clear the Inbox&#8221; can be the biggest time-saver of all. Ask yourself whether it&#8217;s really worth even scanning many emails, or deleting them, with today&#8217;s excellent search technology.</p>
<p>A final but important point &#8211; your system doesn&#8217;t mention delegation. I work as an Online Business Manager for companies that literally hand me chunks of their business to manage for them. Entrepreneurs who aren&#8217;t good at communications, working with staff, or creating systems, simply have me do that. I work with some brilliant Virtual Assistants who can allow an entrepreneur to pass over their customer service, or affiliate management, or other aspects of their business they don&#8217;t want to do themselves. I think it&#8217;s really important for each of us to ask where our brilliance lies, and do our work there, delegating as much of the rest as possible.</p>
<p>That means I use the TRAF, or (more fun but less elegant) FART system for email and such. Toss, Refer, Act, File. This allows me to get that very important delegation step in the process. Notice there&#8217;s no &#8220;Read&#8221; step at all &#8211; it&#8217;s always part of Act or Refer, but not done for all steps.<br />
.-= Karilee´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CorestoneManagementConsulting/~3/YIfr0ttaHwg/" rel="nofollow">Reducing Office Politics</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4313</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4313</guid>
		<description>@bretthimself: Thanks for commenting - I hope it works for you.

@Dinah: I definitely agree with you about the check/clicky stuff. I suggest people be very careful with filters, as many people fall down precisely because stuff falls in those filters and hide away.

@Yann: Thanks, Yann!

@Mike: &lt;blockquote&gt;For me, the worst thing about Inbox Zero is that it does tend to feed the email/twitter/rss OCD loop – when there are only a few messages, it’s easy to process them as a diversion from the important.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Monday&#039;s post will address this - it&#039;s something I&#039;ve been meaning to write for a long time. Hold on, Mike! (And, as always, thanks for showing up and adding to the discussion!)

@Cindy: Yep - but with the same caveats that I mentioned in my reply to Dinah.

@Karl: You might want to check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.productiveflourishing.com/email-triage/&quot; title=&quot;Email Triage: An Easier, Effective, and Less Stressful Way to Process Email&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Email Triage&lt;/a&gt;, as it has some specific tips for how to deal with the problem of replying. But, in general, try chipping away at one or two every time you process email; you&#039;ve already paid the cognitive transaction fee, so you might as well do something once you&#039;re already in that space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bretthimself: Thanks for commenting &#8211; I hope it works for you.</p>
<p>@Dinah: I definitely agree with you about the check/clicky stuff. I suggest people be very careful with filters, as many people fall down precisely because stuff falls in those filters and hide away.</p>
<p>@Yann: Thanks, Yann!</p>
<p>@Mike:<br />
<blockquote>For me, the worst thing about Inbox Zero is that it does tend to feed the email/twitter/rss OCD loop – when there are only a few messages, it’s easy to process them as a diversion from the important.</p></blockquote>
<p>Monday&#8217;s post will address this &#8211; it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been meaning to write for a long time. Hold on, Mike! (And, as always, thanks for showing up and adding to the discussion!)</p>
<p>@Cindy: Yep &#8211; but with the same caveats that I mentioned in my reply to Dinah.</p>
<p>@Karl: You might want to check out <a href="http://www.productiveflourishing.com/email-triage/" title="Email Triage: An Easier, Effective, and Less Stressful Way to Process Email" rel="nofollow">Email Triage</a>, as it has some specific tips for how to deal with the problem of replying. But, in general, try chipping away at one or two every time you process email; you&#8217;ve already paid the cognitive transaction fee, so you might as well do something once you&#8217;re already in that space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Staib - Work Happy Now</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4259</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Staib - Work Happy Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4259</guid>
		<description>My problem is with needing time to think of a reply. I know that I should just tackle it, but sometimes I need a little time to process. A few hours goes by and I&#039;ve moved on. I need a system to follow back up.

I do need to use the trash more often. I just let my build up and the more popular my blog gets the harder it is to control. I just need to get rid of the crap and focus on what is really important.

A wonderful method. Thank you! Very much needed today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem is with needing time to think of a reply. I know that I should just tackle it, but sometimes I need a little time to process. A few hours goes by and I&#8217;ve moved on. I need a system to follow back up.</p>
<p>I do need to use the trash more often. I just let my build up and the more popular my blog gets the harder it is to control. I just need to get rid of the crap and focus on what is really important.</p>
<p>A wonderful method. Thank you! Very much needed today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Morus</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4258</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Morus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4258</guid>
		<description>Using Rules to clear the ones to be Archived for future reference is a big help, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Rules to clear the ones to be Archived for future reference is a big help, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stankavich</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stankavich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4257</guid>
		<description>Charlie, thanks for giving a name and a process to what I have intuitively been doing for a while.  You are so right - it&#039;s a lot less daunting to get through the responses after you go through and eliminate the trash and reference/FYI material.  

That being said, I have a low enough volume of email that I haven&#039;t given up on Inbox Zero yet - I get to the bottom at least two or three times per week.  For me, the worst thing about Inbox Zero is that it does tend to feed the email/twitter/rss OCD loop - when there are only a few messages, it&#039;s easy to process them as a diversion from the important.
.-= Mike Stankavich´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stankavich.com/index.php/2009/04/short-sale-auction-for-my-previous-home/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Short Sale Auction for my Previous Home&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, thanks for giving a name and a process to what I have intuitively been doing for a while.  You are so right &#8211; it&#8217;s a lot less daunting to get through the responses after you go through and eliminate the trash and reference/FYI material.  </p>
<p>That being said, I have a low enough volume of email that I haven&#8217;t given up on Inbox Zero yet &#8211; I get to the bottom at least two or three times per week.  For me, the worst thing about Inbox Zero is that it does tend to feed the email/twitter/rss OCD loop &#8211; when there are only a few messages, it&#8217;s easy to process them as a diversion from the important.<br />
.-= Mike Stankavich´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.stankavich.com/index.php/2009/04/short-sale-auction-for-my-previous-home/" rel="nofollow">Short Sale Auction for my Previous Home</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yann</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>Yann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>Clear and simple. It&#039;s a very good method you got here. Nice post.
.-= Yann´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/YannTessier/statuses/4458335336&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;YannTessier: RT: @zen_habits: On Zen Habits: The Habit Change Cheatsheet: 29 Ways to Successfully Ingrain a Behavior http://is.gd/3LrGw ~tips will help&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clear and simple. It&#8217;s a very good method you got here. Nice post.<br />
.-= Yann´s last blog ..<a href="http://twitter.com/YannTessier/statuses/4458335336" rel="nofollow">YannTessier: RT: @zen_habits: On Zen Habits: The Habit Change Cheatsheet: 29 Ways to Successfully Ingrain a Behavior </a><a href="http://is.gd/3LrGw" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/3LrGw</a> ~tips will help =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4239</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>Yes. I think of this difference every time I read an older productivity book.

First get the easy &quot;check-check-check-click one button/do one keystroke&quot; stuff out of your face, then look at what actually needs more brain power.

Ideally, automate as much of that no-brainer stuff as possible through use of filters and good anti-spam solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I think of this difference every time I read an older productivity book.</p>
<p>First get the easy &#8220;check-check-check-click one button/do one keystroke&#8221; stuff out of your face, then look at what actually needs more brain power.</p>
<p>Ideally, automate as much of that no-brainer stuff as possible through use of filters and good anti-spam solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bretthimself</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/the-s-t-a-r-method-a-more-effective-less-stressful-way-to-process-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4238</link>
		<dc:creator>bretthimself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=2651#comment-4238</guid>
		<description>Thanks a bunch. My email inbox is normally really cluttered, so this sounds worth a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a bunch. My email inbox is normally really cluttered, so this sounds worth a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
