<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does RescueTime Rescue Your Time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>The Art of Meaningful Productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:04:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Confluence: Orgmentis</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-6457</link>
		<dc:creator>Confluence: Orgmentis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-6457</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Knowledge Base...&lt;/strong&gt;

Must have Facts (y) Basecamp&#039;s (from 37Signals) conversion of total accounts to paid accounts is about %0.87 and higher: Guess the Value: Basecamp (Nov, 2006)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Knowledge Base&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Must have Facts (y) Basecamp&#8217;s (from 37Signals) conversion of total accounts to paid accounts is about %0.87 and higher: Guess the Value: Basecamp (Nov, 2006)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracking Computer Time &#60; segfault zen</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-6397</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracking Computer Time &#60; segfault zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-6397</guid>
		<description>[...] concerns &#8211; and I admit to being cautious. However, there are reviews (one, two, three, four) by some reputable people and organizations, so I think its credibility is a bit better off than a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] concerns &#8211; and I admit to being cautious. However, there are reviews (one, two, three, four) by some reputable people and organizations, so I think its credibility is a bit better off than a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Gilkey</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gilkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-453</guid>
		<description>@ James: Thanks for stopping by and commenting.  For the most part, I&#039;m with you - seeing how much time we spend on the computer is informative and useful.  After about a week or two, though, saturation has been met, and if there&#039;s a problem we need to fix it.  RescueTime is currently not really part of the solution.

@ Jared: I&#039;ve never heard of TimeSnapper.  I&#039;ll start it up and get it going, especially if it has some of the enhancements that RescueTime currently lacks.  Thanks for the comment, scouting, and link - I always appreciate your thoughtful replies.

@ Francis: You&#039;re right on the money.  RescueTime is nifty and beautiful but doesn&#039;t provide the AH-HA that we need.

@ Tony: I figured that you dismissed me as a little pissant blogger that didn&#039;t know what he was talking about :p.  I agree with you wholeheartedly that measuring the problem is a critical part of solving the problem - but I worry that RescueTime isn&#039;t giving the type of information that really illuminates the problem.  I don&#039;t really need to spend more time writing; I need to spend more time writing on &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; rather than &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;.

You guys are on the right track, and I recognize that this is a young product.  I hope you all took it as constructive feedback, as I would really like to see a program like this deliver the goods.  I&#039;ll definitely stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ James: Thanks for stopping by and commenting.  For the most part, I&#8217;m with you &#8211; seeing how much time we spend on the computer is informative and useful.  After about a week or two, though, saturation has been met, and if there&#8217;s a problem we need to fix it.  RescueTime is currently not really part of the solution.</p>
<p>@ Jared: I&#8217;ve never heard of TimeSnapper.  I&#8217;ll start it up and get it going, especially if it has some of the enhancements that RescueTime currently lacks.  Thanks for the comment, scouting, and link &#8211; I always appreciate your thoughtful replies.</p>
<p>@ Francis: You&#8217;re right on the money.  RescueTime is nifty and beautiful but doesn&#8217;t provide the AH-HA that we need.</p>
<p>@ Tony: I figured that you dismissed me as a little pissant blogger that didn&#8217;t know what he was talking about :p.  I agree with you wholeheartedly that measuring the problem is a critical part of solving the problem &#8211; but I worry that RescueTime isn&#8217;t giving the type of information that really illuminates the problem.  I don&#8217;t really need to spend more time writing; I need to spend more time writing on <em>this</em> rather than <em>that</em>.</p>
<p>You guys are on the right track, and I recognize that this is a young product.  I hope you all took it as constructive feedback, as I would really like to see a program like this deliver the goods.  I&#8217;ll definitely stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Great post-- very insightful.  Everyone here at RescueTime read it!

We have a long (and fun!) road ahead of us here-- most of the feature suggestions that you mention are on the list.

FWIW, I am a firm believer that measuring a problem is a critical step to solving the problem...  And sometimes it&#039;s a sufficient step.  Just the act of seeing this data tends to prompt positive change.  We see an average 9% increase in productive behavior for users who use RescueTime for 2 months.  

We&#039;re certainly not going to stop there, though.  As you say, it&#039;s really not a Time Management &quot;Solution&quot;.

So stay tuned! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post&#8211; very insightful.  Everyone here at RescueTime read it!</p>
<p>We have a long (and fun!) road ahead of us here&#8211; most of the feature suggestions that you mention are on the list.</p>
<p>FWIW, I am a firm believer that measuring a problem is a critical step to solving the problem&#8230;  And sometimes it&#8217;s a sufficient step.  Just the act of seeing this data tends to prompt positive change.  We see an average 9% increase in productive behavior for users who use RescueTime for 2 months.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;re certainly not going to stop there, though.  As you say, it&#8217;s really not a Time Management &#8220;Solution&#8221;.</p>
<p>So stay tuned! <img src='http://www.productiveflourishing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technotheory.com - Participation on the Interwebs (and AllTop)</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Technotheory.com - Participation on the Interwebs (and AllTop)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-440</guid>
		<description>[...] Productive Flourishing - a review of whether RescueTime Rescues Your Time? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Productive Flourishing &#8211; a review of whether RescueTime Rescues Your Time? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-432</guid>
		<description>This was a thoughtful post, and I think that it&#039;s saying that the value of knowing how you spent your computer time is an interesting, but not critical piece of information to have.

It strikes me that it falls into the bucket of applications that offer a bit of information &quot;after the fact&quot; but do little to help one &quot;before the fact.&quot;  In other words, the data ise of little use from day to day, when one discovers that he/she spent 30 minutes more web-surfing than originally intended.

You run the program, you find out.... so what?  It doesn&#039;t mean that tomorrow you should do anything differently.

Also, when the phone rings and the program keeps on recording the activity, the numbers are bound to be incorrect.

I think it might be useful to see how accurately we are able to schedule our time, but it&#039;s not a BIG ah-hah.

I wonder if the makers of the program actually use it themselves?

I use Uconomix Snaplogger which takes a simple screen every five minutes, so that when I fill in my activity logs, I can go back and see what I was doing at my computer, if I was there.

Hmm... that reminds me that I need to update my log... (I use OpenAir to track my time from week to week.)

I&#039;m off!

Thanks for the great review.

&lt;em&gt;Francis Wade&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/24/time-management-and-cognitive-load-theory/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Time Management and Cognitive Load Theory&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a thoughtful post, and I think that it&#8217;s saying that the value of knowing how you spent your computer time is an interesting, but not critical piece of information to have.</p>
<p>It strikes me that it falls into the bucket of applications that offer a bit of information &#8220;after the fact&#8221; but do little to help one &#8220;before the fact.&#8221;  In other words, the data ise of little use from day to day, when one discovers that he/she spent 30 minutes more web-surfing than originally intended.</p>
<p>You run the program, you find out&#8230;. so what?  It doesn&#8217;t mean that tomorrow you should do anything differently.</p>
<p>Also, when the phone rings and the program keeps on recording the activity, the numbers are bound to be incorrect.</p>
<p>I think it might be useful to see how accurately we are able to schedule our time, but it&#8217;s not a BIG ah-hah.</p>
<p>I wonder if the makers of the program actually use it themselves?</p>
<p>I use Uconomix Snaplogger which takes a simple screen every five minutes, so that when I fill in my activity logs, I can go back and see what I was doing at my computer, if I was there.</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; that reminds me that I need to update my log&#8230; (I use OpenAir to track my time from week to week.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m off!</p>
<p>Thanks for the great review.</p>
<p><em>Francis Wade&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/24/time-management-and-cognitive-load-theory/' rel="nofollow">Time Management and Cognitive Load Theory</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Goralnick</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-430</guid>
		<description>These are really excellent points about RescueTime--I&#039;ve played with it as well as TimeSnapper, and though I find there to be weaknesses...the positives (time tracking, overall general analysis) are great selling features.

I&#039;ve found that TimeSnapper&#039;s filtering does help me to get answers about how much specific time is spent on certain projects...but in the end, I&#039;m using this information more for productivity in answering questions about &quot;what was I doing when...&quot; or &quot;how much time did I spend on that...&quot; than actually changing my behaviors.

Such a thorough analysis you&#039;ve got here Charlie.  Great work!

&lt;em&gt;Jared Goralnick&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/technotheory/~3/276873287/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A quick checklist for making your email more professional&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are really excellent points about RescueTime&#8211;I&#8217;ve played with it as well as TimeSnapper, and though I find there to be weaknesses&#8230;the positives (time tracking, overall general analysis) are great selling features.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that TimeSnapper&#8217;s filtering does help me to get answers about how much specific time is spent on certain projects&#8230;but in the end, I&#8217;m using this information more for productivity in answering questions about &#8220;what was I doing when&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;how much time did I spend on that&#8230;&#8221; than actually changing my behaviors.</p>
<p>Such a thorough analysis you&#8217;ve got here Charlie.  Great work!</p>
<p><em>Jared Goralnick&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/technotheory/~3/276873287/' rel="nofollow">A quick checklist for making your email more professional</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Chartrand - Men with Pens</title>
		<link>http://www.productiveflourishing.com/does-rescuetime-rescue-your-time/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>James Chartrand - Men with Pens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productiveflourishing.com/?p=153#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to my post about Rescue Time. I admit that when I wrote the post, I was fairly new to the service. Now that I&#039;ve spent more time with it, I found myself nodding through your examination.

One thing that I enjoyed about RescueTime: It gave me an accurate presentation of how much time I spent at the computer. I used to answer, &quot;Oh, eight hours a day... maybe nine.&quot;  Seeing that I was clocking a regular 14 hours and more per day was shocking, to say the least.

Same thing with email - I knew it was an important aspect of my business. But how much time it cost me was startling.

So RT has its good points... and its needs for improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to my post about Rescue Time. I admit that when I wrote the post, I was fairly new to the service. Now that I&#8217;ve spent more time with it, I found myself nodding through your examination.</p>
<p>One thing that I enjoyed about RescueTime: It gave me an accurate presentation of how much time I spent at the computer. I used to answer, &#8220;Oh, eight hours a day&#8230; maybe nine.&#8221;  Seeing that I was clocking a regular 14 hours and more per day was shocking, to say the least.</p>
<p>Same thing with email &#8211; I knew it was an important aspect of my business. But how much time it cost me was startling.</p>
<p>So RT has its good points&#8230; and its needs for improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
